Origin of Evil:
Exaggeration of God's Sovereignty leads to a Rejection of Creator/Creature Distinction

Regarding the ultimate origin of the universe, there are only a few basic alternatives: a) the universe was created by a transcendent God; b) the universe has always existed; or c) the universe came from absolutely nothing. The latter alternative is rarely argued since it is absurd. If the doctrine of creation is rejected, the universe must be eternal, and usually this entails the view that "God" and the universe are one and the same.

Pantheism means "all is God". Since pantheists usually do not consider the whole universe to be personal, pantheism is equivalent to "pan-everything-ism". But if God is everything, then God is nothing, because there is nothing that is not God.

Einstein was once asked -- to settle an argument -- whether he believed in God. He replied that he believed in Spinoza's God’ [1]. Since for Spinoza the words 'God' and 'Nature' were synonymous Einstein was, in the eyes of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, unequivocally an atheist [2]. It was in this Spinozistic understanding of the word 'God' that Einstein protested against quantum theory "The Lord God does not play dice." And it is in a similar way that we have to interpret his statement, now inscribed over a fireplace in Fine Hall in Princeton University: "God who creates and is nature is very difficult to understand, but he is not arbitrary or malicious."

This view thus tends toward monism, which is a prevalent theme in Eastern religions. For example, one of the major problems with any monism is that it loses the ability to distinguish moral categories. Evil and good become indistinguishable. How well could you accept this if you were a victim of crime?

Panpsychism attributes consciousness to all matter. A modern example of this view is the process theology of A. N. Whitehead. This view recognizes a distinction between the world and God, but God is not sovereign over the world. "God can only hope to influence its self-creative process by being the reservoir of past experiences, the presenter of present possibility and the persuader of future development." (Polkinghorne, 1978). Process theology "has been described as a sophisticated form of animism" (Gunton, 1978), so greatly does it locate initiative in panpsychic matter.... "the God of Whitehead is a curiously passive deity" (Polkinghorne, 1978).

Genesis teaches instead that the creatures have life in themselves -- they are not simply a front for God (Gen. 1:30). Biblical reality is vivid with self-existent creatures in abundance.

[1] A. Sommerfeld, "To Albert Einstein's Seventieth Birthday", in P.A. Schilpp (ed.) Albert Einstein': Philosopher Scientist , Harper Torchbooks, Vol. 1,1959, p.103.

[2] Out of my Later Years, Thames & Hudson, 1950, pp. 26 - 27.

(Source: http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/antony_flew/hawking.html)

Polkinghorne, Science and Providence, God's Interaction with the World (1989).

Gunton, C.E., Being and Becoming, Oxford University Press (1978).

Return to trilogic diagram